Isaac Scientific Publishing

Journal of Advances in Education Research

Research on the Model of Autonomous Creation of College English Teaching Based on Innovation Perspective

Download PDF (280.9 KB) PP. 50 - 59 Pub. Date: May 2, 2020

DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2020.52002


  • Dan Xu*
    Faculty of International Studies, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China


With China's increasing national strength, English, as an international language, has become increasingly prominent in its social role. The society puts forward new standards for college English teaching, and raises higher requirements for the training of foreign language talents. It particularly emphasizes the importance of the cultivation of comprehensive communicative competence in English language in college English teaching. This article starts with discussing the impact of college entrance examination English reform on college English education, summarizes the characteristics of research from the perspective of innovation, and clarifies the characteristics of teaching and learning modes from the perspective of innovation. From the aspect of improving the self-quality of English teachers, it seeks a breakthrough for the reform of college English teaching, and explores the way for teachers to independently create students from the perspective of innovation. Related research results can effectively improve the quality of English teachers, make English teachers have their own sense of mission and urgency, make bold innovations, and cultivate more comprehensive English talents.


innovation perspective, college English, college students, autonomous creation


[1] Wang P Y, Yang H C (2012), “Using collaborative filtering to support college students’ use of online forum for English learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 628–637.

[2] Lamb M (2012), “A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings,” Language learning, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 997–1023.

[3] Ahmed M (2016), “The effect of a flipping classroom on writing skill in English as a foreign language and students’ attitude towards flipping,” US-China foreign language, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 98–114.

[4] Aljumah F H (2012), “Saudi learner perceptions and attitudes towards the use of blogs in teaching English writing course for EFL majors at Qassim University,” English language teaching, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 100–116.

[5] Al-Issa A S, Al-Bulushi A H (2012), “English language teaching reform in Sultanate of Oman: The case of theory and practice disparity,” Educational research for policy and practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141–176.

[6] Wenhong H (2016), “Study on college English teaching mode multimedia assisted based on computer platform,” International journal of multimedia and ubiquitous engineering, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 351–360.

[7] Tong F, Shi Q (2012), “Chinese–English bilingual education in China: A case study of college science majors,” International journal of bilingual education and bilingualism, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 165–182.

[8] Nguyen X N C M, Walkinshaw I (2018), “Autonomy in teaching practice: Insights from Vietnamese English language teachers trained in Inner-Circle countries,” Teaching and teacher education, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 21–32.

[9] Tayan B M (2017), “The Saudi Tatweer education reforms: Implications of neoliberal thought to Saudi education policy,” International education studies, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 61–71.

[10] Yeh Y L, Lan Y J (2018), “Fostering student autonomy in English learning through creations in a 3D virtual world,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 693-708.

[11] Jindapitak N (2019), “English as an ASEAN lingua franca and the role of nativeness in English education in Thailand: Moving toward the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC),” English today, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 36–41.

[12] Nurman K, Arsyad S (2019), “Discourse markers in argumentative essay by the English education study program’s students of Universitas Bengkulu: A cross-sectional study,” Journal of English education and teaching, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–41.