Journal of Advances in Education Research

A Discussion on Student Use of Theoretical Frameworks for the Analysis of Discourse and Policy within ECE

Download PDF (176.2 KB) PP. 1 - 10 Pub. Date: February 1, 2018

DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2018.31001

Author(s)

Nicola Dunham^*
Massey University

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore theoretical frameworks that align with critical pedagogy to inform critical analysis of issues within early childhood education (ECE). This paper is particularly aimed at early childhood student teachers engaging in analysis of discourse and policy associated with ECE in Aotearoa New Zealand, but may hold relevance to other fields and disciplines. The paper begins by defining the concept of critical pedagogy and a theoretical framework, and then proceeds to outline examples of theoretical frameworks relevant to critical pedagogy and ECE. Attention is given to key concepts associated with Freire, Foucault, Bourdieu, and kaupapa Māori. Banking education is the central theme within the framework of Freire; mapping discourse for Foucault, social order and forms of capital for Bourdieu and finally the concepts of ako, poutama and tuakana/teina associated with kaupapa Māori. The paper concludes by highlighting the value of using a theoretical framework informed by critical pedagogy to probe the social landscape for points of inclusion, exclusion and marginalisation. It is concluded that without such a theoretical framework the analysis of educational policy and discourse is likely to verge on a mere stating of current positions, rather than challenging and seeking to reposition issues in support of social justice: a restating as it were.

Keywords

Critical pedagogy, theoretical framework, māori, Aotearoa New Zealand

References

[1] L. Bartlett (2008), “Paulo Freire and Peace Education”. In Encyclopedia of Peace Education. Information Age Publishing, pp. 39–46.

[2] P. Bourdieu (1989), “Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory,” vol, no. 1, pp. 14–25.

[3] P. Bourdieu (1994), “Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power”. In Culture/power/history: A reader in Contemporary Social Theory. Princeton University Press, pp. 155–199.

[4] P. Bourdieu (2007), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

[5] P. Bourdieu and L. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Polity Press.

[6] L. Chant (2009), “Discourses on Indigenity: The Media, The Warrior Gene and Aggressive Caucasians,” Mai Review, vol. 2, pp. 1–4.

[7] Controller and Auditor General (2012), Education For Māori: Context For Our Proposed Audit Work Until 2017. Office of the Auditor General.

[8] P. Diamond (2010), “Te tāpoi Māori - Māori tourism - Resurgence of the Māori Tourist Industry,” Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand Available from http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/te-tapoi-maori-maori-tourism/page-4

[9] M. Foucault (1988), Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity In The Age of Reason. Random House.

[10] M. Foucault, M (2002), The Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge.

[11] Foucault, M and J. D. Faubion (2000), Power. New Press.

[12] Freire Institute. (n.d), “Concepts Used by Paolo Freire,” Available from http://www.freire.org/paulo-freire/concepts-used-by-paulo-freire.

[13] P. Freire (2000), Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

[14] H. Giroux (2013), “Critical Pedagogy in Dark Times”. Praxis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 27–38.

[15] H. Giroux (2014), The Violence of Organized Forgetting: Thinking Beyond America’s Disimagination Machine. City Lights Books.

[16] A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan (2012), Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. Routledge.

[17] S. Jones (2010), “Working With Words: A Bourdieuian Approach to Researching Higher Education Entrepreneurship,” Methodology: Innovative Approaches to Research, vol, Spring, pp. 8–10.

[18] J. L. Kincheloe (2008), Critical Pedagogy Primer. Peter Lang.

[19] R. Mahuika (2008), “Kaupapa Māori Theory is Critical and Anti-colonial,” Mai Review, vol. 3, Article 4.

[20] P. McLaren (1999). “A pedagogy of possibility: Reflecting upon Paulo Freire’s politics of education: In memory of Paulo Freire,” Educational Researcher, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 49–56.

[21] Ministry of Education (1996), Te Whāriki: He Whāriki Matauranga mo nga Mokopuna o Aotearoa. Learning Media.

[22] Ministry of Education (2008), Ka Hikitia: Accelerating Success 2013-2017. Ministry of Education New Zealand.

[23] Ministry of Education (2013), Tau mai te reo: The Māori Language in Education Strategy 2013-2017. Ministry of Education New Zealand.

[24] R. Pere (1997), Te Wheke: A Celebration of Infinite Wisdom. Aoako Global Learning New Zealand Ltd.

[25] L. Pihama and K. Smith and M. Taki and J. Lee (2004), A Literature Review on Kaupapa Maori and Maori Education Pedagogy. The International Research Institute for Maori and Indigenous Education.

[26] D. Swartz (1997), Culture & Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. The University of Chicago Press.

[27] A. Tangaere (1997), “Maori Human Development Learning Theory,” In Mai i rangiatea: Maori Wellbeing and Development. Auckland University Press and Bridget Williams Books, pp. 46–59.

[28] Trent University (n.d), “Theoretical Frameworks,” Available from https://www.trentu.ca/history/workbook/ theoreticalframeworks.php

[29] L. Vygotsky (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.